Aim This study aimed to translate the MHHS into Arabic and to culturally adapt and validate the Arabic version. Lau BC, Scribani M, Lassiter T, Wittstein J. SECTION II ORIGINAL ARTICLES: Hip. Outcome variables were healing of fracture (union, delayed union, non-union), avascular necrosis and Harris Hip Score (HHS). The pain domain measures pain severity and its … To evaluate the clinical outcome the Harris Hip Score (HHS) and the activity score by Sutherland et al. All patients underwent clinical evaluation 1 and 5 years after operation using our modified Harris hip score. A further study is currently underway to evaluate the … In the patients who underwent two-stage surgery, no nerve palsy was observed, and the single one-stage patient with incomplete peroneal nerve palsy recovered fully 4 weeks postoperatively. Aseptic cup loosening is still one of the main reasons leading to acetabular cup failures. The second and third sections require the physiotherapist to assess the patient or client's hip joint and function. The HHS is a measure of dysfunction so the higher the score, the better the outcome for the individual. Results can be recorded and calculated online. The maximum score possible is 100. The PROs utilized were modified Harris hip score (mHHS), non-arthritic hip score (NAHS), and hip outcome score sports-specific subscale (HOS-SSS). Correlation of Single Assessment Numerical Evaluation Score for Sport and Activities of Daily Living to Modified Harris Hip Score and Hip Outcome Score in Patients Undergoing Arthroscopic Hip Surgery. Related terms: Hip Arthroscopy; Bone Necrosis; Arthroplasty; Osteoarthritis; Hip Arthroplasty; Western Ontario and McMaster Universities Osteoarthritis Index The aim of this study was to perform a validity test of the Harris hip score and to test its reliability. He was 57. The mHHS has also been used to evaluate functional outcome after hemiarthroplasty and THR for fracture neck of femur [ 7 , 8 , 9 ]. Shock G, who blended whimsical wordplay with reverence for ’70s funk as leader of the off-kilter Bay Area hip-hop group Digital Underground, has died. G Jalen Harris returned after being out since March 14 with a hip injury. Methods: We conducted a prospective cohort study at a single centre in a consecutive series of patients with The aim of this study was to create a Harris Hip Score increased to a mean value of 71.5 points (range 52–93 points). At the final evaluation, the mean Harris hip score, UCLA activity score, and the Koval category were 82.5, 4.6, and 1.5, respectively. Functional outcomes study with Harris Hip Score showed that patients’ satisfaction was excellent in 99 hips. The Harris Hip Scale (HHS) was developed for the assessment of the results of hip surgery, and is intended to evaluate various hip disabilities and methods of treatment in an adult population. An ocial Slovenian version has not been culturally adapted and validated. The original version of the test was developed in 1969 by William H. Harris. The total points form a scale from 0 to 91. The utility of heterotopic ossification (HO) classification systems is debatable. MODIFIED HARRIS HIP SCORE. The pain scores and Harris hip scores were comparable between the two groups before treatment (p = 0.071, 0.066), but the differences became statistically significant after treatment ( p < 0.001). Traumatic arthritis of the hip after dislocation and acetabular fractures: treatment by mold arthroplasty. The standard evaluation applies to various hip disabilities and methods of treatment in adults. The mean Parker score for the entire study population was 7.77. The data from the second hip of the 3 bilateral cases were removed to reduce potential for any interpatient bias, leaving 115 hips (115 patients) for analysis. We had 3 (15%) avascular necrosis of femoral head. The Harris Hip Score (HHS) is one of the most widely used health related quality of life (HRQOL) measures for the assessment of hip pathology: in spite of this, a validation study, and an official Italian version have not been provided yet. Outcome measures included in this review are the Harris Hip Score, the Hip Disability and Osteoarthritis Outcome Score, the Oxford Hip Score, the Lequesne Index of Severity for Osteoarthritis of the Hip, and the American Academy of Orthopedic Surgeons Hip and Knee Questionnaire. Results Of the 59 hips, majority (76%) had acetabular inclination of 46-55 degrees. Materials and methods We prospectively evaluated the hip function (Harris hip score) and quality of life (WOMAC and SF-12 scores) of 80 patients who underwent one-stage revision for aseptic loosening (Group A, 40 patients) or two-stage revision for septic total hip prostheses (Group S, 40 patients). HARRIS HIP SCORE (HHS) Description Purpose. 3.6. The range of motion and Harris hip score (HHS) were calculated in 104 patients with known HO after total hip arthroplasty and 208 matched controls without HO. doi: 10.1016/j.jclinepi.2014.08.009 Article PubMed PubMed Central Google Scholar The mean Oxford score was 19.1 (range 12-52, SD 9.5), and Harris score was 89.4 (range 47-100, SD 13.3)—an improvement of 50 points from preoperative to postoperative. Two cohorts were studied. It was developed in 1969, and … Harris hip score and SF-36 Health Questionnaire scores were recorded to evaluate initial stability of the joint prosthesis and limb recovery. The growing popularity of therapeutic hip arthroscopy over the past decade continues to drive outcome-related research. Health outcome measures in the evaluation of total hip arthroplasties--a comparison between the Harris hip score and the Oxford hip score. A Harris score of ≥ 90 points corresponds to excellent; 80–89, good; 70–79, tolerable; < 70, inferior . Harris H. JBJS(Am). Introduction: The original Harris hip score (HHS) does not contain ability to perform squatting and sitting cross legged as items in the questionnaire and hence a need was felt to modify the Harris hip score so that it could stay relevant in functional assessment of Indian patients in the rural setting. Link The mean Harris hip score was 91 points, and Lunceford functional results were excellent in 15 hips, good in 24, fair in 4 and poor in 2. Total hip arthroplasty (THA) is a well-established treatment in patients suffering from arthritic disease of the hip, reducing pain and improving function [].By replacing the degenerative joint with a prosthetic stem and cup, one seeks to restore the normal anatomy of the joint, but several controversies remain regarding the optimal placement of the components [2–4]. It is used to evaluate many different types of hip disabilities and methods of treatment. Cited Here ORIGINAL ARTICLE Cross-cultural adaptations of the Oxford-12 HIP score to the French speaking population C. Delaunaya,∗, J.-A. Content. PFN had shown excellent Harris hip score in all type of intertrochanteric fractures than DHS group. There was no significant difference in the outcome at six months between the two procedures as the p-value was 0.9203. If you believe that this Physiopedia article is the primary source for the information you are refering to, you can use the button below to access a related citation statement. Outcome scores for surgical evaluation are generally based on generic questionnaires. Original Research Article A Prospective Observational Study of Clinical, Functional and Radiological Assessment of Unstable Intertrochanteric Fracture of Femur in Elderly Patients Treated with Proximal Femoral Nail Antirotation Using Harris Hip Score Dr. Akshay Jain1, Dr. Lokesh Gudda Naik2, Dr. Pawal Gajendra Prabhakar1, Dr. Ankit Jain3 Journal of Arthroplasty 20: 1037–1041. Published: April 13, 2021 Nonunion of the osteotomy occurred in one hip (2%). Context Although the Modified Harris Hip Score (MHHS) is used worldwide, it has not been translated into Arabic or validated for use among Arabic populations. The Harris hip score (HHS), a joint-specific health status questionnaire, is frequently used by clinicians to assess the outcome of the hip. Objective: To compare responsiveness of the Harris Hip Score with generic measures (that is, the Short Form-36 (SF-36), and a test of walking speed and pain during walking) in patients with osteoarthritis (OA) of the hip. Modified Harris hip score. Ninety percent of the stems were in the central position and 10% were in the varus position. 2001;384:189-197 10.1097/00003086-200103000-00022. The mean Harris hip score in the hip resurfacing group improved from a mean of 47 points (range, 31 to 62 points) pre-operatively to a mean of 96 points (range, 72 to 100 points), post-operatively. With only 12 questions, the Oxford Hip Score is the simplest outcome assessment tool. This self-administered, evaluative, patient-based outcome measure was created in 1996 to assess the perception of pain and function among patients undergoing total hip arthroplasty. Harris Hip Score provides another important tool for assessing quality of life of patients with hip disorders. 3.5. The original version was published 1969. This study aims to evaluate postoperative pain and functional and clinical outcomes of anterolateral supine (ALS) and posterolateral (PL) approaches for primary total hip arthroplasty. Method: The first 75 cases within the population of a randomised clinical trial on manual therapy and exercise therapy were selected for secondary analysis. Harris Hip Score Pain (check one) Stairs None or ignores it (44) Normally without using a railing (4) Slight, occasional, no compromise in activities (40) Normally using a railing (2) Mild pain, no effect on average activities, rarely moderate In any manner (1) June 1969 1. The mean Harris hip score improved from 40.9 to 89.1, and mean leg length discrepancy (LLD) in 13 unilateral cases was reduced from 2.95 to 0.8 cm. We retrospectively examined the joints of 110 patients who underwent primary total hip arthroplasty (THA). Original Article Defining the Maximum Outcome Improvement of the Modified Harris Hip Score, the Nonarthritic Hip Score, the Visual Analog Scale For Pain, and the International Hip Outcome Tool-12 in the Arthroscopic Management for Femoroacetabular Impingement Syndrome and Labral Tear The HOOS questionnaire is also useful compared with the Nonarthritic Hip Score and the modified Harris hip score (MHHS) . The majority of patients in the ESWT group reported considerable relief of hip pain at night and The most lasting legacy from this classic 1969 article from William Harris is the author’s proposed hip score. These articles have been selected by the Editor-in-Chief and Deputy Editors of The Journal because of their long-standing significance to the orthopaedic community and the many citations they receive in the literature. The Harris hip score is a disease-specific measure for hip arthroplasty, which was introduced in the year 196916. For the same patients, the Harris hip score was 61.2 ± 16.6 (range, 24–96) and the Short Form-12 had a mean score of 81.9 ± 10.9 (range, 22–56). Harris Hip Score (HHS) is the most widely used instrument when assessing hip disability.58 63 We only included the MHHS, and not the original HHS, since this instrument cannot be considered a true PRO questionnaire as it is a composite score that combines patient-reported information and physical assessment performed by an observer. The Modified Harris Hip Score (MHHS) is a patient-reported questionnaire that includes assessments based on pain and on function. For ease of presentation, this score range was rescaled to 0 to 100. It is extensively used, with high validity and reliability demonstrated in several studies17. This hip scoring method was developed by Harris in 1969 as a mean of evaluating patient outcome after total hip arthroplasty. In time, clinical scope of the score has increased and now it is used for hip replacement, assessment of femoral neck fractures and hip osteoarthritis. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/William_H._Harris_(orthopaedic_surgeon) Original article peer-reviewed Cultural Adaptation and Validation of an Arabic Version of the Modified Harris Hip Score Abdullah N. Al-Qahtani, Osama A. Alsumari , Hussam S. Al Angari, Yazeed N. Alqahtani, Rakan A. Almogbel, Abdullah A. AlTurki. A “single, reliable figure” designed to be equally applicable to different hip problems and different treatments, the Harris Hip Score is still used worldwide today in routine evaluations before and after hip … 3D printing porous trabecular titanium metal acetabular cup may provide good initial stability and secondary fixation because of its highly interconnected, porous structure. The free Information and Calculation Service, Designed for Orthopaedic Surgeons, Physicians, Physical Therapists, Osteopaths, Chiropractors and Patients. There were no significant differences in mean Harris hip scores between the hip resurfacing and patients total hip arthroplasty cohorts (p = 0.53). Epinetteb, J. Dawsonc, D. Murrayd, B.-M. Jollese a Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, clinique Yvette, 67—71, route de Corbeil, 91160 Longjumeau, France and validation of the Slovenian version of Harris Hip Score Petra Josipović1,4*, Metka Moharič2 and Dea Salamon3 Abstract Introduction: The Harris Hip Score is the most widely used outcome measure for the assessment of hip patholo-gies. None, or ignores it 44 B. Conclusion There was high risk of nonunion in subcapital type fracture, displaced fracture (Garden stage III and IV) and vertically oriented fracture (Pauwels type III). JBJS Classics: The Harris Hip Score Each m onth during the coming year, OrthoBuzz will bring you a current commentary on a “classic” article from The Journal of Bone & Joint Surgery . PMID: 31519399. All adult patients aged 18 to 60 years were included. The Harris Hip Score (HHS) is a commonly used physician assessment of physical functioning and pain relief on clinical sites . From: Surgical Treatment of Hip Arthritis, 2009. Kalairajah Y, Azurza K, Hulme C, Molloy S, Drabu KJ. 111 hips (96%) were perceived as forgotten or having no limitations. A functional assessment was done with the Harris Hip Score (HHS). The domains covered are pain, function, absence of deformity, and range of motion. Clinical evaluation included the Harris Hip Score (HHS) , Western Ontario and McMaster Universities Osteoarthritis Index (WOMAC) Score , and SF-36 questionnaires . There were 91 points for pain and function and nine points for range of motion and deformity. The mean follow-up of the study was 11.7 years (range 2.2–21.8 years). They were followed-up clinically and radiologically for one year. The Harris Hip Score is a means of assessing the results of hip surgery. At second visit, the mean score improved by 12.8 (15.7 at first visit and 28.5 at second visit) while at 3rdvisit the score increased by 11.9 (28.5 at 2ndvisit and 40.4 at 3rdvisit). Am J Sports Med 2019 Sep;47 (11):2646-2650. The Harris hip score gives a maximum of 100 points and the … Patients received follow-up DR at 3, 6, and 12 months. Forty patients (51 hips) were ultimately included in this study for analysis. Is the Harris hip score system useful to study the outcome of total hip replacement? The quality of fixation was assessed, by neck-shaft angle and Tip Apex Distance (TAD). Use for study and research. The aim of this study was to perform a validity test of the Harris hip score … The Harris hip score showed excellent results in 49 hips (94%) and good results in 3 hips (6%). One item evaluates the pain (0–44 points), while 7 items evaluate the patient’s functionality (0–47 points). The aim of the present study is to translate and validate HOS into Spanish. The Oxford Hip Score (OHS) is a joint-specific, patient-reported outcome measure tool designed to assess Similarly the mean Harris hip score of DHS group was 70.6 and that of PFN group was 69. He played the final five minutes of mop-up time. ORIGINAL ARTICLE The validation of the visual analogue scale for patient ... satisfaction VAS with the Harris hip score, pain VAS at rest and during activity, Oxford hip score, Short Form 36 and ... Oxford hip score are good with a rho varying between 0.53 and 0.70. Original Research Article Treatment of stable and unstable intertrochanteric fractures using proximal femoral nail and their functional assessment using modified Harris hip score Lakshya P. Rathore*, Lokesh Gupta, Sanjay Thakur, Sandeep Vaidya, Implant positioning is summarized in Table 3. Data were collected at baseline (preoperatively) and at 3, 6 and 12 months after surgery. All patients underwent clinical evaluation 1 and 5 years after operation using our modified Harris hip score. The aim of this study was to create an Italian valid and reliable version of the HHS. It is a short test, taking roughly five to seven minutes to complete. The original article on the OHS does not indicate how these responses should be scored [ 12 ]. In all cases, we implanted the Wagner femoral cone prosthesis using the direct lateral approach; in the attempt to reestablish native hip biomechanics, 66 stems were 135° and 34 were 125°. Results: Out of 20 fractures, 17 (85%) united uneventfully, 2 (10%) had delayed union and 1 (5%) nonunion. Original Articles The Harris hip score: Comparison of patient self-report with surgeon assessment *, ** Nizar N.MahomedMD, ScD, FRCSC* David C.ArndtMD† Brian J. McGroryMD‡ William H.HarrisMD§Study performed at Orthopaedic Biomechanics Laboratory, Massachusetts General … Physiopedia articles are best used to find the original sources of information (see the references list at the bottom of the article).
Vortex Indicator Chartink, Rslogix Micro Starter Lite, Alcoa Global Fasteners Inc Torrance, Ca, 76ers Vs Hawks Box Score Game 2, Islanders Hockey Club Premier Roster, North Dakota Football Camps 2021,